Bookgasm calls it the 100 page rule. SF Signal calls it the 33% Rule.
Everyone has a breaking point. Michael May had his around page 150 of George RR Martin’s A Game of Thrones (one of my favorites, but to each his own). Personally, my bookmark is still lodged on page 180 of Moby Dick where I placed it over ten years ago (although I do intend to finish it “one of these days,” I swear).
I am an avid reader, working through twenty to twenty-five novels in a year and one hundred or so short stories. That said, I acquire my books the old fashioned way: From a reading list as long as my arm (ok, I admit it… longer than my arm). Most of the books on the list are award winners I haven’t gotten around to yet, or considered to be classics within their genre. Some are recommendations from friends, family, and colleagues, while others I have stumbled across and thought “oooo I forgot about this one!” I say this because, usually, I am not going into the books I read blind. I am not a reviewer who reads, essentially, for a living, picking up the latest releast or ARC and hoping for a byline with an early review. I read because I love reading and my books have passed a certain filter just to reach my perception.
In the rare instance that I do come across a book that begins to turn me away, I tend to shift into a different mode of reading, especially if it is a book I am reading for pleasure. I get much more analytical with it. I want to know why it isn’t grabbing me. I want to know the reasons why something strikes me as “bad” or “un-enjoyable” so I can recognize it in my own work.
Which brings us to an interesting point… What if I was a reviewer? What if, for example, I write a review of a book I stopped reading a third of the way in, is it fair for me to review the book? You bet it is. The fact that I stopped reading is a pretty powerful review. Unless the review is a critical analysis of the book, then it is the experience of reading the book that gets reviewed as much as the book itself. That’s all a reviewing is: Being able to elaborate on “I liked/disliked this book (or movie, or computer game, or toaster, or anything else) because…” and then justifying whatever emotional reaction was generated. Anything beyond that is a critical analysis and subject to a whole host of other constraints.
All told, I think I like the 100 Page Rule. Really, if an author hasn’t hooked me by then, the next 200 pages are going to be… difficult at best.
You must log in to post a comment.