Robert Jordan: 1948-2007

Posted on September 29th, 2007 in Breaking News, Editorial, Fantasy by Robb

You’ve probably heard already, but I wanted to take a moment and offer up a small memoriam for James Rigney, aka Robert Jordan, author of the Wheel of Time series.

Others far more knowledgeable of the man himself have posted or published moving tributes and obituaries across the net. Some of the most touching are from those that knew James Rigney best over at his official blog which remained updated throughout his battle with the rare blood disease amyloidosis.

Though my thoughts go out to his family and friends, the few, inconsequential words I will say will focus on Robert Jordan the storyteller, for that is how I knew him.

I came to The Wheel of Time saga long after it began. In fact, I read each and every book during the summer of 2004 after I was laid off from Jaleco Entertainment. Quite simply, I couldn’t put the books down. Oh, be sure, there were things I took issue with, but the story is… well… wonderfully and immensely convoluted. It struck me as more than just a single story, but a detailed history of a world in peril. And somehow I knew without realizing it that this saga, at the time some 10 or 11 volumes deep, changed the way people and publishers alike looked at fantasy.

George RR Martin said in his tribute that his “ICE & FIRE series might never have found its audience without the cover quote that Jim was so kind as to provide.” I’ll go a step further and say that his Ice and Fire series, one of my absolute favorites, is a stunning evolution of what I refer to as the Historical Fantasy genre that Jordan pioneered with his WoT series.

Though I discovered his WoT series long after it began (1990 with The Eye of the World), I saw immediately the influence the series had on those books I had read in the intervening years (when, obviously, I should have been reading WoT). Not only that, I saw the influence his intricately detailed plotlines and wonderfully flawed characters had on my own writings.

So thank you, Robert Jordan, storyteller, for hours well spent in a world of your creation. If only I could read your work for the first time all over again.

I Just Don’t See It

Posted on September 16th, 2007 in Television Review by Robb

There’s a trick to writing for television. Well… let me rephrase that. There is a trick to writing good, prime-time television drama, with interesting episodes and a compelling overall story arc. I am not talking about situational, episodic television, but series’ that focus on the extended story usually encompassing an entire season, if not multiple seasons.

CSI (and any of its 97 or so incarnations) is a fine example situational, episodic television. There may be a secondary storyline involving one or more of the actors, but the show isn’t about that storyline. It’s about the crime contained within a single episode. It’s about the situation of being employed in that department of that police department at that moment.

On the flip side of this are shows like Lost (which I never managed to get into) and Heroes (which I loved, but fell apart for me in the final, amazingly anti-climactic episode), whose the focus is on the overall storyline. It’s a different kind of writing. Not necessarily more difficult, but certainly more complex. There needs to be a balance in the writing that allows each individual episode to propel the overall story forward, and at the same time be interesting enough to stand on it’s own, hook viewers, and make them want to come back the next week. These are my personal favorite kind of shows when they are done well.

I can remember when The 4400 first aired. Everyone was talking about it. I read all the reviews are listened carefully as friends talked about it each and every week. It sounded like something I would really enjoy. Unfortunately, I didn’t have cable at the time, so I never tuned in, and eventually sort of just forgot about it. This season, I remembered it before the season actually kicked off, and not only do I have cable, I can DVR it and watch it at my leisure. So I let a few episodes accumulate, then sat down and started watching.

And I just don’t see it. Maybe I simply missed too much last season, but this writing is, to be blunt, awful. Not only are the individual episodes insanely boring, but the “willing suspension of disbelief” level is insanely low, bordering on suspending any and all forms of “belief” before I even press PLAY (as in… I can’t believe I just pressed PLAY!). Granted, we are talking about superpowers here, but there are still limits, still a line that cannot be crossed lest you fall into the realm of the comically ludicrous. Telekinesis, ok. Flying, it’s a stretch, but I’ll buy it. Creating a potion that not only stops the aging process but actually reverses it, turning the 20-something year old drinker back into an infant in a matter of hours? STOP. LIST. ERASE ALL. Even my vivid imagination has difficulty sorting through that one. Thankfully, the explanation behind how a mental ability was transferred into a bottle of water was not addressed to further insult my delicate sensibilities.

For those of you who have been watching it all along, have I just missed too much of what has happened previously? Or has the production company really hurt the show in an effort to stretch it out season after season (a la 24 and, I fear, Heroes)?

(PS- Dear writers, it’s a little trite, and a lot tired, to create a prophet/messiah type character that looks amazingly like the standard image of Jesus Christ. It’s worse to then have every other character refer to him as a prophet/messiah repeatedly while he spouts cryptic words of wisdom that any 4 year old could have figured out for themselves.)

Review: The Dune Series by Frank Herbert

Posted on September 15th, 2007 in Book Review, Science Fiction by Robb

(originally posted sometime in 2007… major edits)

Included in this review are the first six books written by Frank Herbert, not the subsequent books written from his notes by his son Brian and Kevin J. Anderson.

Dune

Dune MessiahChildren of DuneGod Emperor of DuneHeretics of DuneChapterhouse: Dune

4 out of 5Author: Frank Herbert

Original Publishers: Ace and Putnam

Publishing Time Frame: 1965-1985

Official Website: http://www.dunenovels.com

It is important to note that Dune is a series unlike most other science fiction or fantasy series. While there is a large, overall storyline that encompasses all of the six books, each book is not individually dependent upon that storyline. Even though the second book, Dune Messiah, firmly establishes the 5,000 year time frame of the remaining novels as “the Golden Path” and ties them all loosely together, each novel itself represents only the briefest, and perhaps most critical of periods along that path.

Because of this, it is not only possible, it is almost essential to judge each book on its own as well as a contributor to the larger story arc (such as you should/could with a series like Robert Jordan’s Wheel of Time or George RR Martin’s Song of Ice and Fire).

All in all, the series as a whole is strong. The middle two books, plagued by an all-knowing, future seeing character, are forced to pare down on very specific issues with Herbert playing a very delicate game of show and tell. Having a major character who knows everything that will happen over the course of the next 25,000 years makes for some interesting writing as Herbert dances around what the future holds for the series without giving too much away about the future of the individual book. The plodding of those two books, however, is more than made up for in the four that bookend them.

What sets this series above most others is its sheer scope. Encompassing a time line of some 7,500 years, Herbert was able to justifiably link the first book, Dune, with the last, Chapterhouse: Dune with room for many more stories to be added up by faithful fans and devoted children (as Brian Herbert has proven). Below, I’ll discuss the six books individually.

Must Read!Dune5 out of 5Title: Dune

Author: Frank Herbert

Publisher: Ace

Originally Published: 1965

More than forty years after its initial publication, Dune remains a pivotal book in genre fiction and is easily the most significant of the series. It is here that Herbert lays the groundwork for the remaining books, and of them all, Dune contains the most complete and, in my opinion, most compelling story. On the surface it is a story of political intrigue and maneuvering, but through Herbert’s deft characterizations and robust world-building, the issues he addresses parallel issues we are still facing today.

Set outwards of 20,000 years in the future, the primary storyline revolves around the political struggles between three noble houses, House Corrino, House Harkonnen, and House Atreides (these houses are detailed as preludes to Dune in volumes of their own by Herbert’s son Brian and science fiction author Kevin J. Anderson. I have not read these volumes.). The story revolves around the struggle for supremacy and control of a single planet, Dune. This struggle incorporates political, economic, religious, and even mystical intrigue and manipulation, and serves as an accurate commentary and discussion on the state of social awareness in the 1960’s.

Perhaps the only issue I take with the book is that it is written in the rather uncommon 3rd person omniscient point of view, which allows Herbert to expand upon the internal musings of all of his characters at any given moment. At times the resulting “head hopping” can get confusing, and moving from one character to another in this manner takes a while to get used to, as there is no specific structure Herbert employs to bring a sense of order to the narration. And with so many different characters, the larger scenes can quickly become almost overwhelming. This PoV does, however, provide for a much more robust character creation process, and allowed Herbert to build very strong characters much quicker than he would have been able to otherwise.

Dune remains as topical today as it did in 1965 and maintains a significance few works are able to achieve. Its many themes range in subject from ecology to religion, pacifism to militarism, and mysticism to ancestor worship. The story itself is one of ascendancy, revenge, destiny, and love. It is complex and told with an almost unbiased historical bent, yet having access to inner thoughts, motivations and intentions for each and every character makes this an unexpected and immensely personal experience.

Dune Messiah4 out of 5Title: Dune Messiah

Author: Frank Herbert

Publisher: G.P. Putnam’s Sons

Originally Published: 1969

Dune Messiah picks up twelve years after the close of Dune. While the basic story is wholly dependent upon the first book, Herbert successfully created a sequel able to stand on its own without having intimate knowledge of it’s predecessor. Some of the finer details would be lost, to be sure, but the story itself would remain complete.

The difference in the two books is immediately apparent, however. The thematic issues in Dune Messiah are much more focused than in the original. Even the size of the book, a mere 220 pages, reflects this concentration. In fact, throughout the remaining books, Herbert seems to focus upon one of the themes initially presented in Dune and explore it more fully and more singly than in that original. Here, it is the robust exploration of religion that Herbert revolves around, and, unfortunately, this singularity leaves Dune Messiah feeling somewhat incomplete. It doesn’t have the rich, all encompassing societal reach that Dune introduces and maintains, and therefore seems at times to be almost myopic in scope. The story itself, while a highly enjoyable read, seems secondary and in place only to serve as a launching point for the four books to follow.

Children of Dune3.5 out of 5Title: Children of Dune

Author: Frank Herbert

Publisher: Berkley Publishing

Originally Published: 1976

Nine years after the close of Dune Messiah, the new Emperor’s children are coming of age in a time of massive social and economic change.

This is one of the weaker novels of the series. The characters are not nearly as well explored or complex than in the previous novels. They are of singular vision with little happening to change their steadfast natures. Duncan Idaho is easily the single most developed and complex character, and his storyline, though it plays only a secondary role in the overall plot of the book, is easily the most compelling in the novel.

As in Dune Messiah, Herbert latches onto a single theme from Dune and explores it more fully, and with much the same result. His explorations are interesting, and in a few cases remarkably profound, but the story he tells seems secondary (and the characters seem tertiary) to these explorations. The thematic issues he focuses upon are those of social and economic change within a society based upon tradition and ancestor worship, along with a theoretical exploration of foretelling the future. These explorations are amazingly thorough, but again, rather than serving the story, they story seems intended to serve the explorations, which, in my mind, lessens the novel as a whole.

God Emperor of Dune3 out of 5Title: God Emperor of Dune

Author: Frank Herbert

Publisher: Putnam

Originally Published: 1981

First and foremost, without knowledge of the previous books, the premise for God Emperor of Dune is, at best, weak. Herbert evidently was well aware of this, as the early chapters are filled with a rehashing of information from the previous three novels. Without this, there is simply no way God Emperor of Dune would have stood on its own. Perhaps the result works better on a reader new to the series, or as a reader removed from the series by 26 year span of publications, but for someone reading the novels back to back, it made the first 150 or so pages agonizingly and monotonously familiar. Beyond those initial pages lies Frank Herberts thorough exploration of religious fanaticism through the 4,000 year old Leto II, the seemingly immortal Emperor of Dune.

Herbert also breaks from the style of the previous novels in that great sections of narration are preaching dialogue from Leto II. It came to my attention mid-read that this novel was originally written in first person, which explains this to a large degree. Unfortunately, Herbert was less than successful in migrating back to the now familiar third person omniscient and the entire novel suffers greatly because of it.

Once again, the story of Duncan is easily the most enjoyable and entertaining, as he is the only character who seems affected by the situation around him, and the only character who experiences any kind of personal journey or change. Everyone else is rather steadfast in their natures, leaving them quite flat and predictable. This extends even to Leto II. Even though his speeches and sermons reveal tremendous amounts of information about him personally and about his intentions and designs, new and unknown information doesn’t seem to affect him in any significant manner.

Because of the tremendous amount of soliloquy performed by Leto II, this novel comes across more as a series of essays punctuated by minor storylines than a full novel with thematic concerns. Of all the novels, this one most of all seems to serve the primary purpose of acting as a bridge between events. It almost seems as if Herbert wanted to get on to another aspect of the universe he created, but felt he was unable to do so until he made the reader more fully aware of what exactly lay upon Leto II’s “Golden Path.” And though the story of Duncan breaks up the “info-dumping” speeches of Leto II, it isn’t enough to really save God Emperor of Dune from itself.

Heretics of DuneChapterhouse: Dune4.5 out of 5Title: Heretics of Dune and Chapterhouse Dune

Author: Frank Herbert

Publisher: Putnam

Originally Published: 1984 and 1985 respectively

There is no way to separate these two novels, as there simply isn’t a complete story contained within either one individually, and neither one is able to stand on its own as even an average read. Together, however, they make for a rich, complex, and potent ending that actually stands out among previous books as the best writing and most enjoyable read since the original Dune 20 years previous.

Taken as a series, which I firmly believe you must do with these two books, Herbert returns to the style of the original, and the results are more than satisfying. The story is complex and the characters rich and deep. Gone is the dependence on knowing the future, and the delicate dramatic dance Herbert was forced to do is able to be cast aside, allowing him to tell the story without fear of having a single, all-knowing character reveal too much, too eary. The storylines entwine and evolve throughout the two books. At times they seem to drag slightly, but the culmination in Chapterhouse Dune makes it all worthwhile. All in all, the two book series eclipses Dune Messiah as the strongest of the Dune followups.

Taken singlulary, Heretics of Dune stands slightly lower than Chapterhouse Dune only because there is no adequate resolution to the ongoing storylines. Had I been forced to wait the year between publications, my opinion Heretics would likely be lower as I would have found myself less than satisfied with the cliff-hanger type ending Herbert employed (that said, had I been forced to wait the four years between publications of, Children of Dune and God Emperor of Dune, my opinion of God Emperor may well have been higher. Funny how that works.)

A final thought on the series…

With the release of Hunters of Dune and Sandworms of Dune, Brian Herbert has reportedly assembled the notes and final outlines of the series and concluded it as his father originally intended. I haven’t read either of these books, although I probably will one day. The problem is, I actually like the way Chapterhouse ends the series. So much of the series was spent struggling for survival with bleak glimpses of the future, the ending was refreshing. It stands well in contrast with what precedes it. More importantly, however, it doesn’t wrap everything up in a nice, neat little bow. It is the end of the story, but it isn’t the end of the characters existence. I like that in an ending. If I discover that Hunters and Sandworms finally lays to rest all the unanswered questions or wraps up the first six books nice and pat… Well, I think I will prefer to pass on Brian’s ending, and keep my fond memories of the world his father Frank created.

A Reading Dilema?

Posted on September 8th, 2007 in Random Thoughts and Stories by Robb

As I mentioned earlier in the week, a recent poll conducted by the Associated Press determined that, on average, 25% of adults surveyed didn’t read a single book last year. On an impulse, I asked the students of one of my ninth grade English classes if they read a book that wasn’t required by school in the last year. I was sadly surprised to find that the 1 to 4 ratio determined by the AP poll for adults was too low for my students, of which 8 of 20 said they don’t read unless it is assigned reading.

The biggest contributor to this may well be the very thing that has the potential to contribute the most to our current educational system: technology. We have become a society of instant-on information. We can customize and tailor the information that makes it way to us, and have that information at our fingertips for immediate access at any time, day or night. DVR and TiVo manage our television needs. Podcasts and RSS feeds help us collect news and information from all the corners of the internet. And it all happens while we sleep, or work. Information is gathered until we are ready for it.

This very moment I have over 15 hours of television on my DVR waiting for me to find time to watch. Shows like Monk, Saving Grace, and Dr. Who are automatically recorded and sorted. I’ll get to them when I have time. I also have 144 unread items in Google Reader from sources who report on topics I am interested in. I don’t have to wait through an evening news broadcast for the news I want, I can power up the PC and have it waiting for me.

All this information, and the technology that surrounds its creation and delivery, has changed the methodologies behind education and entertainment alike. The students I queried wanted something visual, something immediate. “It takes too long” and “it’s too hard to find something good” were common answers as to why they don’t read.

Another answer, though, concerned me more: “Reading is boring.” This reflects more than just the influence of technology. If we (we being educators and parents) want to instill reading fiction as a viable pastime and hobby that will continue outside and beyond the classroom, we need to make sure that what they are reading exciting, interesting material. An understanding of “The Classics” is important, but what good does that do if it simply comes just to be regurgitated verbatim and then forgotten the week after the exam is taken or essay is written? Foster the desire first, and the understanding will not only come, but, in theory at least, will come easier.

All that sounds good on paper, as the saying goes, but I have to wonder if things are really as bad as the USA Today article seems to make out. There isn’t any kind of comparison to previous polls, so there is no way of knowing if there is any kind of trend. Also, a simple turn of the data and you can also say something like “75% of Americans read at least one book last year.” Suddenly, the numbers sound much more positive. I would imagine, for example, that 100 years ago, when reading was one of the few forms of mass entertainment available, that 75% of American adults weren’t even literate, let alone read at least one book a year.

So while yes, the numbers presented are a bit distressing, especially for an English teacher and author, it really shouldn’t be that surprising, nor that alarming.

A Preview

Posted on September 6th, 2007 in Random Thoughts and Stories by Robb

Well, I jumped in my car and took a not-quite-last-minute trip to St. Louis to visit friends before my two semesters get all kicked into gear. The grad student semester started last week, and the teacher semester officially starts tomorrow with the first full day of classes (although I have been working at it almost full time for a couple weeks now trying to get myself prepared). Posts may well fall off a bit with most every waking moment being occupied by teaching, studying, reading, and writing, but I should be able to make time on the weekends.

In the meantime, allow me to direct you over to Nathan Bransford’s blog, which I read on a regular basis because… well just because. You’ll figure it out when you go there. He is a veritable fountain of information regarding the publishing world, and I enjoy his agent’s perspective on things.

You may have seen in the not-too-distant past a great deal of hubbub over the USA Today article that 25% of Americans didn’t read a single book last year. Nathan says he read about 50, which doesn’t surprise me him being a literary agent and all. I have no clue about last year, but this year I have read 22 so far. I’ll likely top out somewhere around 30, since I am bound to slow down now that I am, you know, employed.

I have a theory on the reasons for this, but I figured I would prime the pump here a bit with a quick post to get you in the mood and make the longer post this weekend.

So what about you? Do the USA Today stats hold up for you?