<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Memoriam: 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robbflynn.com/2008/01/06/in-memoriam-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robbflynn.com/2008/01/06/in-memoriam-2007/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robb</title>
		<link>http://www.robbflynn.com/2008/01/06/in-memoriam-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robbflynn.com/2008/01/06/in-memoriam-2007/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>While I agree with what you said, I think it actually stems from something a bit different. For the last 30 years at least, the primary focuses and advances in technology have centered on either generating or controlling the flow of information. It seems to me that there is no in-between in this... you either are a generator of information, a controller of information, or one who collects information.

By default, children are collectors of information. They have to be. What is different now is the sheer amount of information that assaults them. By increasing the information they collect, I think we have actually slowed their intellectual development, as they simply have far too much to try and process at one time. True, they learn to multi-task at a much earlier age, but I also think it is no mere coincidence that the increased diagnoses of ADD and similar "conditions" parallel the increased advances in information dispersal.

It's an incomplete thought at this point, but one I haven't been able to shake since I made this post. I do think that we as a generation have not taught children to take responsibility for themselves, and it's something I want to address in the classroom as much as I can. But with the parents hovering, protecting and, in reality, &lt;i&gt;enabling&lt;/i&gt; their children to continue &lt;i&gt;being&lt;/i&gt; lazy, there isn't an easy way out of it that I can grasp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with what you said, I think it actually stems from something a bit different. For the last 30 years at least, the primary focuses and advances in technology have centered on either generating or controlling the flow of information. It seems to me that there is no in-between in this&#8230; you either are a generator of information, a controller of information, or one who collects information.</p>
<p>By default, children are collectors of information. They have to be. What is different now is the sheer amount of information that assaults them. By increasing the information they collect, I think we have actually slowed their intellectual development, as they simply have far too much to try and process at one time. True, they learn to multi-task at a much earlier age, but I also think it is no mere coincidence that the increased diagnoses of ADD and similar &#8220;conditions&#8221; parallel the increased advances in information dispersal.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an incomplete thought at this point, but one I haven&#8217;t been able to shake since I made this post. I do think that we as a generation have not taught children to take responsibility for themselves, and it&#8217;s something I want to address in the classroom as much as I can. But with the parents hovering, protecting and, in reality, <i>enabling</i> their children to continue <i>being</i> lazy, there isn&#8217;t an easy way out of it that I can grasp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickdiaz</title>
		<link>http://www.robbflynn.com/2008/01/06/in-memoriam-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>nickdiaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robbflynn.com/2008/01/06/in-memoriam-2007/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Our society, with every passing moment, becomes increasingly self-centered, absorbed in our own perspectives and increasingly impatient for instant gratification in all parts of our lives.  This behavior is magnified as though through a lens unto the latest generation of children, as are all behavioral trends.

So you're quiet right, it is indeed a form of laziness.  And its only going to get worse.

Then again, it was George Orwell who said, "Every generation imagines itself to be more intelligent than the one that went before it, and wiser than the one that comes after it."  Maybe you and I are just getting crochety in our old age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our society, with every passing moment, becomes increasingly self-centered, absorbed in our own perspectives and increasingly impatient for instant gratification in all parts of our lives.  This behavior is magnified as though through a lens unto the latest generation of children, as are all behavioral trends.</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re quiet right, it is indeed a form of laziness.  And its only going to get worse.</p>
<p>Then again, it was George Orwell who said, &#8220;Every generation imagines itself to be more intelligent than the one that went before it, and wiser than the one that comes after it.&#8221;  Maybe you and I are just getting crochety in our old age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
