Review: Ender’s Game

Posted on December 16th, 2007 in Book Review, Reading, Science Fiction by Robb

5 out of 5Must Read!Title: Ender’s Game
Author: Orson Scott Card
Publisher: Tor
Year Published: 1985

Ender’s Game is, without a doubt, one of the single best novels Science Fiction has to offer. It broaches themes and topics far beyond the scope of standard SF fare. It asks deep, terrifying questions; questions whose answers, in the twenty-two years since it’s novelized publication, have evolved and grown with society but have also remained at the periphery of all our smaller questions. Much like Ender himself, we poke at the details while those larger questions go unanswered, or, worse, unasked.

With Ender’s Game, Orson Scott Card may not have redefined the genre (I think the genre is far too strong to be redefined by any single work), but he most certainly made it sit up and take notice. Much like the work of Ursula K. LeGuin in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s (The Left Hand of Darkness in particular) Card raised the stakes for genre authors by focusing upon issues entwined with his contemporary social conscious. Ender’s Game is as much a story about an embattled child psychology as it is about interstellar war, as much about political and social manipulation as it is about individual isolation and alienation, and as much about xenophobia and annihilation as it is about love and the strength of family.

The explorations Card makes into and through all these areas is at once hesitant and terrified. They are, after all, the explorations of a boy who, regardless of how super-intelligent he may be, is working though these issues for the first time. Fumbling for first for an understanding of the questions themselves, the answers he so desperately craves from the very first page must be put on hold until he comes to some sort of greater understanding about first himself, and then the world he has left behind.

This isn’t the first time I have read Ender’s Game, and it certainly will not be the last. Already I am itching to begin again and look for things I may have missed. I’ll wait, though. I’ll wait and let time and experience bring me more information so that when Ender once again faces those big questions I’ll have more to bring to the table. And maybe, just maybe, I’ll be a little closer to coming away with some of my own answers rather than just more questions.

Review: The Dune Series by Frank Herbert

Posted on September 15th, 2007 in Book Review, Science Fiction by Robb

(originally posted sometime in 2007… major edits)

Included in this review are the first six books written by Frank Herbert, not the subsequent books written from his notes by his son Brian and Kevin J. Anderson.

Dune

Dune MessiahChildren of DuneGod Emperor of DuneHeretics of DuneChapterhouse: Dune

4 out of 5Author: Frank Herbert

Original Publishers: Ace and Putnam

Publishing Time Frame: 1965-1985

Official Website: http://www.dunenovels.com

It is important to note that Dune is a series unlike most other science fiction or fantasy series. While there is a large, overall storyline that encompasses all of the six books, each book is not individually dependent upon that storyline. Even though the second book, Dune Messiah, firmly establishes the 5,000 year time frame of the remaining novels as “the Golden Path” and ties them all loosely together, each novel itself represents only the briefest, and perhaps most critical of periods along that path.

Because of this, it is not only possible, it is almost essential to judge each book on its own as well as a contributor to the larger story arc (such as you should/could with a series like Robert Jordan’s Wheel of Time or George RR Martin’s Song of Ice and Fire).

All in all, the series as a whole is strong. The middle two books, plagued by an all-knowing, future seeing character, are forced to pare down on very specific issues with Herbert playing a very delicate game of show and tell. Having a major character who knows everything that will happen over the course of the next 25,000 years makes for some interesting writing as Herbert dances around what the future holds for the series without giving too much away about the future of the individual book. The plodding of those two books, however, is more than made up for in the four that bookend them.

What sets this series above most others is its sheer scope. Encompassing a time line of some 7,500 years, Herbert was able to justifiably link the first book, Dune, with the last, Chapterhouse: Dune with room for many more stories to be added up by faithful fans and devoted children (as Brian Herbert has proven). Below, I’ll discuss the six books individually.

Must Read!Dune5 out of 5Title: Dune

Author: Frank Herbert

Publisher: Ace

Originally Published: 1965

More than forty years after its initial publication, Dune remains a pivotal book in genre fiction and is easily the most significant of the series. It is here that Herbert lays the groundwork for the remaining books, and of them all, Dune contains the most complete and, in my opinion, most compelling story. On the surface it is a story of political intrigue and maneuvering, but through Herbert’s deft characterizations and robust world-building, the issues he addresses parallel issues we are still facing today.

Set outwards of 20,000 years in the future, the primary storyline revolves around the political struggles between three noble houses, House Corrino, House Harkonnen, and House Atreides (these houses are detailed as preludes to Dune in volumes of their own by Herbert’s son Brian and science fiction author Kevin J. Anderson. I have not read these volumes.). The story revolves around the struggle for supremacy and control of a single planet, Dune. This struggle incorporates political, economic, religious, and even mystical intrigue and manipulation, and serves as an accurate commentary and discussion on the state of social awareness in the 1960’s.

Perhaps the only issue I take with the book is that it is written in the rather uncommon 3rd person omniscient point of view, which allows Herbert to expand upon the internal musings of all of his characters at any given moment. At times the resulting “head hopping” can get confusing, and moving from one character to another in this manner takes a while to get used to, as there is no specific structure Herbert employs to bring a sense of order to the narration. And with so many different characters, the larger scenes can quickly become almost overwhelming. This PoV does, however, provide for a much more robust character creation process, and allowed Herbert to build very strong characters much quicker than he would have been able to otherwise.

Dune remains as topical today as it did in 1965 and maintains a significance few works are able to achieve. Its many themes range in subject from ecology to religion, pacifism to militarism, and mysticism to ancestor worship. The story itself is one of ascendancy, revenge, destiny, and love. It is complex and told with an almost unbiased historical bent, yet having access to inner thoughts, motivations and intentions for each and every character makes this an unexpected and immensely personal experience.

Dune Messiah4 out of 5Title: Dune Messiah

Author: Frank Herbert

Publisher: G.P. Putnam’s Sons

Originally Published: 1969

Dune Messiah picks up twelve years after the close of Dune. While the basic story is wholly dependent upon the first book, Herbert successfully created a sequel able to stand on its own without having intimate knowledge of it’s predecessor. Some of the finer details would be lost, to be sure, but the story itself would remain complete.

The difference in the two books is immediately apparent, however. The thematic issues in Dune Messiah are much more focused than in the original. Even the size of the book, a mere 220 pages, reflects this concentration. In fact, throughout the remaining books, Herbert seems to focus upon one of the themes initially presented in Dune and explore it more fully and more singly than in that original. Here, it is the robust exploration of religion that Herbert revolves around, and, unfortunately, this singularity leaves Dune Messiah feeling somewhat incomplete. It doesn’t have the rich, all encompassing societal reach that Dune introduces and maintains, and therefore seems at times to be almost myopic in scope. The story itself, while a highly enjoyable read, seems secondary and in place only to serve as a launching point for the four books to follow.

Children of Dune3.5 out of 5Title: Children of Dune

Author: Frank Herbert

Publisher: Berkley Publishing

Originally Published: 1976

Nine years after the close of Dune Messiah, the new Emperor’s children are coming of age in a time of massive social and economic change.

This is one of the weaker novels of the series. The characters are not nearly as well explored or complex than in the previous novels. They are of singular vision with little happening to change their steadfast natures. Duncan Idaho is easily the single most developed and complex character, and his storyline, though it plays only a secondary role in the overall plot of the book, is easily the most compelling in the novel.

As in Dune Messiah, Herbert latches onto a single theme from Dune and explores it more fully, and with much the same result. His explorations are interesting, and in a few cases remarkably profound, but the story he tells seems secondary (and the characters seem tertiary) to these explorations. The thematic issues he focuses upon are those of social and economic change within a society based upon tradition and ancestor worship, along with a theoretical exploration of foretelling the future. These explorations are amazingly thorough, but again, rather than serving the story, they story seems intended to serve the explorations, which, in my mind, lessens the novel as a whole.

God Emperor of Dune3 out of 5Title: God Emperor of Dune

Author: Frank Herbert

Publisher: Putnam

Originally Published: 1981

First and foremost, without knowledge of the previous books, the premise for God Emperor of Dune is, at best, weak. Herbert evidently was well aware of this, as the early chapters are filled with a rehashing of information from the previous three novels. Without this, there is simply no way God Emperor of Dune would have stood on its own. Perhaps the result works better on a reader new to the series, or as a reader removed from the series by 26 year span of publications, but for someone reading the novels back to back, it made the first 150 or so pages agonizingly and monotonously familiar. Beyond those initial pages lies Frank Herberts thorough exploration of religious fanaticism through the 4,000 year old Leto II, the seemingly immortal Emperor of Dune.

Herbert also breaks from the style of the previous novels in that great sections of narration are preaching dialogue from Leto II. It came to my attention mid-read that this novel was originally written in first person, which explains this to a large degree. Unfortunately, Herbert was less than successful in migrating back to the now familiar third person omniscient and the entire novel suffers greatly because of it.

Once again, the story of Duncan is easily the most enjoyable and entertaining, as he is the only character who seems affected by the situation around him, and the only character who experiences any kind of personal journey or change. Everyone else is rather steadfast in their natures, leaving them quite flat and predictable. This extends even to Leto II. Even though his speeches and sermons reveal tremendous amounts of information about him personally and about his intentions and designs, new and unknown information doesn’t seem to affect him in any significant manner.

Because of the tremendous amount of soliloquy performed by Leto II, this novel comes across more as a series of essays punctuated by minor storylines than a full novel with thematic concerns. Of all the novels, this one most of all seems to serve the primary purpose of acting as a bridge between events. It almost seems as if Herbert wanted to get on to another aspect of the universe he created, but felt he was unable to do so until he made the reader more fully aware of what exactly lay upon Leto II’s “Golden Path.” And though the story of Duncan breaks up the “info-dumping” speeches of Leto II, it isn’t enough to really save God Emperor of Dune from itself.

Heretics of DuneChapterhouse: Dune4.5 out of 5Title: Heretics of Dune and Chapterhouse Dune

Author: Frank Herbert

Publisher: Putnam

Originally Published: 1984 and 1985 respectively

There is no way to separate these two novels, as there simply isn’t a complete story contained within either one individually, and neither one is able to stand on its own as even an average read. Together, however, they make for a rich, complex, and potent ending that actually stands out among previous books as the best writing and most enjoyable read since the original Dune 20 years previous.

Taken as a series, which I firmly believe you must do with these two books, Herbert returns to the style of the original, and the results are more than satisfying. The story is complex and the characters rich and deep. Gone is the dependence on knowing the future, and the delicate dramatic dance Herbert was forced to do is able to be cast aside, allowing him to tell the story without fear of having a single, all-knowing character reveal too much, too eary. The storylines entwine and evolve throughout the two books. At times they seem to drag slightly, but the culmination in Chapterhouse Dune makes it all worthwhile. All in all, the two book series eclipses Dune Messiah as the strongest of the Dune followups.

Taken singlulary, Heretics of Dune stands slightly lower than Chapterhouse Dune only because there is no adequate resolution to the ongoing storylines. Had I been forced to wait the year between publications, my opinion Heretics would likely be lower as I would have found myself less than satisfied with the cliff-hanger type ending Herbert employed (that said, had I been forced to wait the four years between publications of, Children of Dune and God Emperor of Dune, my opinion of God Emperor may well have been higher. Funny how that works.)

A final thought on the series…

With the release of Hunters of Dune and Sandworms of Dune, Brian Herbert has reportedly assembled the notes and final outlines of the series and concluded it as his father originally intended. I haven’t read either of these books, although I probably will one day. The problem is, I actually like the way Chapterhouse ends the series. So much of the series was spent struggling for survival with bleak glimpses of the future, the ending was refreshing. It stands well in contrast with what precedes it. More importantly, however, it doesn’t wrap everything up in a nice, neat little bow. It is the end of the story, but it isn’t the end of the characters existence. I like that in an ending. If I discover that Hunters and Sandworms finally lays to rest all the unanswered questions or wraps up the first six books nice and pat… Well, I think I will prefer to pass on Brian’s ending, and keep my fond memories of the world his father Frank created.

The Bell, it Tolls Not for Thee

Posted on August 6th, 2007 in Editorial, Science Fiction by Robb

About every 3 or 4 months, it seems, the blogosphere gets all-a-flutter about the demise of science fiction. The cycle seems to be coming around again. I have seen, at last count, 4 postings, all unrelated, drift through my Google Reader inbox in the last three days. Inevitably, this will mean at least 2 responses to each from other blogs I lurk at, and likely at least 1 rebuttal-response-rebuttal scenario, likely played out over on LiveJournal somewhere.

Most often, the original posts are quite well thought out. Even if they don’t compliment each other in content, they usually make some pretty strong points. Most often they focus on the “literary establishment” and how it doesn’t “take SF seriously.” Sometimes it gets wrapped up in a good, old fashioned rant about how modern day critics and theorists just don’t “get” SF because they are hung up on outdated critical methodologies. As a grad student who deals with those very methodologies, suffice it to say…

So?

SF is just a genre, folks. If anything it is becoming overwhelmed by the sheer number of sub-genres that it has spawned, just like what happened to Gothic Fiction, the genre that oh-so-many decades ago spewed forth Science Fiction.

And just where is Gothic Fiction now, you ask? I answer, “Everywhere.” The sum of its parts have become greater than the whole, and the Gothic resides in books and subjects with which it is not often associated. It has become so firmly established that Gothic elements are used in works ranging from To Kill a Mockingbird to The Road to Interview With a Vampire. Yet none of these can be said to be a truly, solely, Gothic tale. More importantly, however, can any of these stories, or any story, really, be wrapped up in a neat little bow of a single genre?

Take a look at Kindred by Octavia Butler. Most often it is found on the Science Fiction shelves. Why? Because it has time travel in it. Never mind that the time travel in question has nothing at all to do with science. Never mind that 80-90% of the novel takes place in the past, in a setting so amazingly detailed and realistic that it could arguably pass for historical fiction. Never mind that the time travel itself borders on the mystical or magical, thus making Fantasy perhaps a better tag than Science Fiction.

Better still, look at The Road by Cormac McCarthy (review being reposted soon). Borders and B&N didn’t know what to do with this one. I mean, it won the Pulitzer, it has to be literary, right? But… look what it’s about! Doesn’t a dystopic setting automatically mean a SF label? But this is also a Coming of Age story, as well as a warped kind of Hero’s Quest story. If you remove the science from the story… nothing changes, because, like Kindred, there isn’t any science anywhere in the story.

So, fear not, I know it seems like it when you watch the SciFi Original Movies, but SF hasn’t died, nor is it going to. It has grown to a point where many stories, like Kindred and The Road, incorporate Science Fiction elements in the same way that To Kill a Mockingbird incorporates Gothic elements. The genre has become so broad that it casts its influence upon stories that are not immediately recognizable as Science Fiction.

And believe it or not, this is a good thing, even for the SF die-hards that read nothing else. With the tentacles of SF reaching into the mainstream and literary worlds, it means more and more authors will be using SF elements to tell their stories. It gives us all a much wider selection to choose from, even you die-hard all-science-all-the-time types.

By the way, for those of you who haven’t read Kindred or The Road I highly recommend them both. One day, when you are in between Asher and Watts books, pick one up. I would be highly surprised if the stories don’t suck you in and spit you out a day or 2 later.